This search combines search strings from the content search (i.e. "Full Text", "Author", "Title", "Abstract", or "Keywords") with "Article Type" and "Publication Date Range" using the AND operator.
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2023, 19, 303–316, doi:10.3762/bjoc.19.26
Graphical Abstract
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2021, 17, 873–884, doi:10.3762/bjoc.17.73
Scheme 1: Kinetic mechanisms. In each case E represents the free enzyme, other species starting E are other e...
Figure 1: Reaction progress for “ordered, second” kinetics and the effect of D/Q (e.g., NADH/NAD+) ratio. S0 ...
Figure 2: Effect of the initial starting material concentration and enzyme E value for “ordered, second” kine...
Figure 3: Effects of key enzyme parameters on the fall in product ee during reaction for “ordered, second” ki...
Figure 4: Reaction progress for “ping-pong, second” kinetics, and the effect of the ratio of donor to prochir...
Figure 5: Effect of the key ee decline parameter (eeDP) of the enzyme on the product ee for “ping-pong, secon...
Figure 6: Effects of prochiral substrate concentration and its KM value for “ping-pong, first” kinetics. Inpu...
Figure 7: Effect of eeDP and k−4 · Keq/k4 on the product ee at high conversion for “ping-pong, first” kinetic...
Figure 8: Progress curves for “ping-pong, both” kinetics, diacid esterification. The plot shows the increasin...
Figure 9: Effects on the ee of the product formed early in the reaction for “ping-pong, both” kinetics, diaci...
Figure 10: Increase in the product ee as the reaction proceeds for “ping-pong, both” kinetics, diacid esterifi...
Figure 11: Effects on the ee at high conversion for diacid ester synthesis, “ping-pong, both” kinetics. Parame...